Furthermore, the district court held that Brick Township was not in violation of the "reasonable accommodations" provision of the FHAA. The court rejected Hovsons' disparate impact argument, reasoning that Hovsons had failed to establish that handicapped persons were more adversely impacted by the zoning ordinance than people without disabilities. On August 16, 1995, the district court issued its findings of fact and conclusions of law. In the R-R-2 zone, Brick Township permits the following land uses as of right and without conditions: (1) customary and conventional farming activities (2) one-family dwellings (3) public schools and accredited private schools (4) municipal parks, playgrounds and other municipally owned facilities and (5) planned residential retirement communities.Ī one-day bench trial was held on July 12, 1995. The district court found that the R-R-2 zone is "primarily, although not exclusively, for residential use," and that this region was zoned by community planners with the intention of "minimiz traffic" and bringing about an environment that was both "quiet" and "seclu." Hovsons, Inc. Hovsons has proposed to construct Holiday Village in Brick Township's R-R-2 or "Rural Residential-Adult Community Zone." Id. Nursing homes are excluded from all fifteen residential zones. Brick Township is divided into a total of twenty-three zoning districts comprised of fifteen residential zones, seven business/office zones and one hospital support zone.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |